The relationship of stress and locis of control to academic procrastination in Ormawa student faculty of health Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nor Amalia Muthoharoh
Kismi Mubarokah
Aprianti Aprianti
Rika Juniar Amalia
Naufal Rizky Faddhlurrohman

Abstract

Academic procrastination is an activity of procrastinating work that students do when they get their main assignment, namely studying. This research was conducted with the aim of finding out whether there is an influence and relationship related to stress and local control on students who take part in student organization activities at the Faculty of Health, Dian Nuswantoro University through academic achievement index scores and questionnaires, especially students who are in the core organizational structure. This research will be carried out at 6 student organizations at the Faculty of Health, Dian Nuswantoro University in October 2023 – January 2024 (Suhandianto and Pratitis Nindia, 2020). Using survey methods with a quantitative correlational approach.(Siska Martiana et al., 2022)The results of the multiple regression analysis together show that there is an influence between the independent variables stress (X1) and Locus of Control (X2) on the dependent variable academic procrastination (Y) of 0.093, which means that there is an influence between the two independent variables on the dependent variable of 09.3 % and the remaining 90.7% is influenced by other variables not studied at this time. The results of the second hypothesis research test, namely the independent variables Stress (X1) and Locus of control (X2), which were tested simultaneously, have an influence on the Academic Procrastination variable (Y) which can be seen from the T and F tests. Where are the results of the T and F tests? The comparison value is obtained as Fcount equal to 2.971 < Ftable 3.156, then together with the stress variable (X1) we get a value of tcount 2,345 > Ttable 1.672 and the variable locus of control (X2) obtained a value of tcount 0,171 < ttable 1,672. In conclusion, there is a very significant influence between stress and student academic procrastination and there is an insignificant influence between locus of control and academic procrastination. This means that if the locus of control results are low, students are classified as having an internal locus of control which has little influence on the occurrence of academic procrastination.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Muthoharoh, N. A., Mubarokah, K., Aprianti, A., Amalia, R. J. and Faddhlurrohman, N. R. (2024) “The relationship of stress and locis of control to academic procrastination in Ormawa student faculty of health Universitas Dian Nuswantoro”, Science Midwifery, 12(1), pp. 346-357. doi: 10.35335/midwifery.v12i1.1412.

References

Baqi Muti’ul, 2020. PROKRASTINASI AKADEMIK PADA MAHASISWA AKTIVIS.
Basri, Dwiningrum Nawang Retno, 2020. Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan 15, 139.
BP Abd Rahman, Munandar Sabhayati Asri, Fitriani Andi, Karlina Yuyun, Yumriani, 2022. Journal Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar 2, 1–8.
Cahyono, H.B.I.S.S.B.R.D., 2019. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Setiabudhi 1, 2019.
Chiang, Y. Te, Fang, W.T., Kaplan, U., Ng, E., 2019. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11.
Crosswell, A.D., Lockwood, K.G., 2020. Health Psychol Open 7.
Dwiyani Vivi, Herlina, Nopriadi, 2022. GAMBARAN FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT DALAM PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN DARING PADA MAHASISWA FAKULTAS KEPERAWATAN UNIVERSITAS RIAU, JOM FKp.
Fauzi, A.A., Pahlevi, T., 2020. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP) 8, 449–457.
Haryanti, A., Santoso Rudi, 2022. SUKMA: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi 1, 41–47.
Hidayati Lina Nur, Harsono Mugi, 2021. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen 18.
Jamila, 2020. Jurnal EduTech 6, 257–261.
Kabiba, Arfin, Junaidin, 2021. Didaktis: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan 21.
Mawardi, K., 2019. Insania : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan 24, 120–130.
Mawarizky Syifa, 2020. PENGARUH STRES DAN LOCUS OF CONTROL TERHADAP.
Nastiti, D., 2023. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan 4, 64–76.
Pertiwi, G.A., 2020. Jurnal Imiah Psikologi 8, 738–749.
Purba, N., Ekonomi, F., Bisnis, D., Uin, I., Utara, S., Yahya, M., 2021. JPSB 9, 91–98.
Putra Ananda Dandi Muhamad, Nasution Angreyani Siska, Feriz Jabsy Naufal, Sa’adah Nurus, Rahma Aulia Ghina, 2022. Prosiding 16th University Research Colleqium 2022.
Rahmadani Anjar Eka, 2019. HUBUNGAN TINGKAT PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING.
Rika Ernima, Y., Parimita, W., Wibowo, A., 2019. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis 4, 2302–2663.
Setyowati, A., Jurnal, S., Manajemen, R., Subroto, S., 2019. Jurnal Riset Manajemen & Akuntansi 8.
Siska Martiana, D., Indah, E., Ningsih, W., Afifah, J., Siliwangi, U., 2022. CERMIN: JURNAL PENELITIAN Universitas Abdurrachman Saleh Situbondo 6, 30–41.
Suhandianto, Pratitis Nindia, 2020. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang) 10, 204–223.
Surani, D., 2019. STUDI LITERATUR : PERAN TEKNOLOG PENDIDIKAN DALAM PENDIDIKAN 4.0, in: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP. pp. 456–469.
Syaadah, R., Hady, M., Silitonga, N., Rangkuty, S.F., 2022. PEMA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat 2, 125–131.