Technology acceptance model (TAM) of telescreening innovation for the prevention of mortality of high-risk pregnant women in Jayapura Regency, Papua

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Adi Kurniawan
M.J. Al Farabi

Abstract

The maternal mortality rate in Papua is still high. This study aimed to assess the readiness and benefits of telescreening high-risk pregnant women based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) theory in Jayapura District, Papua. This cross-sectional study was based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire distributed to health workers with a validated Likert scale, and analyzed using the Structural Equation Model with the LISREL application. The results of the analysis showed that the total internet connection was 71% good or very good. 77% of respondents felt that telescreening high-risk pregnant women would be useful with 76% of respondents having the intention to commit to using the telescreening. Internet access in Jayapura Regency is good and not a barrier to telescreening. This TAM can be the basis for developing telescreening for early detection of high-risk pregnant women, so that deaths can be prevented

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Kurniawan, A. and Farabi, M. A. (2024) “Technology acceptance model (TAM) of telescreening innovation for the prevention of mortality of high-risk pregnant women in Jayapura Regency, Papua”, Science Midwifery, 12(3), pp. 1200-1205. doi: 10.35335/midwifery.v12i3.1643.

References

Alves, D. S., da Silva, É. M. A., Honorato, M. B., & de Araújo Novaes, M. (2019). Prototype of care application for obstetric telemonitoring of hypertensive syndromes in high risk pregnancy. In MEDINFO 2019: Health and Wellbeing e-Networks for All (pp. 1769-1770). IOS Press.
Breton M., Sullivan E. E., Deville-Stoetzel N., McKinstry D., DePuccio M., Sriharan A., Deslauriers V., Dong A., McAlearney A. S. (2021). Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by primary healthcare physicians in Quebec and Massachusetts. BMC Fam Pract, 22 (192), pp.1-13.
Campbell-Yeo, M., Dol, J., Richardson, B., McCulloch, H., Hundert, A., Foye, S., ... & Whitehead, L. (2021). A co-design of clinical virtual care pathways to engage and support families requiring neonatal intensive care in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (COVES study). Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 27(6), 463-470.
Combi, C., Pozzani, G., & Pozzi, G. (2016). Telemedicine for developing countries. Applied clinical informatics, 7(04), 1025-1050.
Deldar, K., Tara, F., Bahaadinbeigy, K., Khajedaluee, M., & Tara, M. (2017). A data model for teleconsultation in managing high-risk pregnancies: design and preliminary evaluation. JMIR Medical Informatics, 5(4), e8393.
DePuccio, M. J., Gaughan A. A., Shiu-Yee K., McAlearney, A. S. (2022) Doctoring from home: Physicians’ perspectives on the advantages of remote care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE 17(6): e0269264.
Dinkes Provinsi Papua. (2019). Laporan kinerja Dinas Kesehatan Profinsi Papua Tahun 2019. Available at: https://e-renggar.kemkes.go.id/file2018/e-performance/1-259002-2tahunan-719.pdf.
Funderskov, K. F., Boe Danbjørg, D., Jess, M., Munk, L., Olsen Zwisler, A. D., & Dieperink, K. B. (2019). Telemedicine in specialised palliative care: Healthcare professionals' and their perspectives on video consultations—A qualitative study. Journal of clinical nursing, 28(21-22), 3966-3976.
Garne, K., Brødsgaard, A., Zachariassen, G., & Clemensen, J. (2016). Telemedicine in neonatal home care: identifying parental needs through participatory design. JMIR research protocols, 5(3), e5467.
Haleem A, Javaid M, Singh RP, Suman R. 2021. Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International 2, 100117.
Hardanhi, B., Sibuea, F., Widiantini, W. (2021). Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2020. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2021. Available at: https://www.kemkes.go.id/downloads/resources/download/pusdatin/profil-kesehatan-
Hwei, L. R. Y., & Octavius, G. S. (2021). Potential advantages and disadvantages of telemedicine: A literature review from the perspectives of patients, medical personnel, and hospitals. Journal of Community Empowerment for Health, 4(3), 180-186.
Idris, U., Frank, S. A. K., Hindom, R. F., & Nurung, J. (2021). Family planning (KB) practices and the impact on Papuan women reproductive health. Gaceta Sanitaria, 35, S479–S482.
Jakubowski, D., Sys, D., Kajdy, A., Lewandowska, R., Kwiatkowska, E., Cymbaluk-Płoska, A., ... & Kwiatkowski, S. (2021). Application of telehealth in prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic—a cross-sectional survey of Polish women. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(12), 2570.
Lu, K., Marino, N. E., Russell, D., Singareddy, A., Zhang, D., Hardi, A., ... & Puri, V. (2018). Use of short message service and smartphone applications in the management of surgical patients: a systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 24(6), 406-414.
Maarop, N., Singh, S. H., & Win, K. T. (2011). TTeleconsultation Technology and Its Benefits: In the Case of Public Hospitals in Malaysia.
Malau, K. P., & Santi, B. T. (2022). Telemedicine acceptance and usage in Jakarta metropolitan area. Journal Of Widya Medika Junior, 4(3), 193-198.
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal access in the information society, 14, 81-95.
Palmer, K. R., Tanner, M., Davies-Tuck, M., Rindt, A., Papacostas, K., Giles, M. L., ... & Hodges, R. J. (2021). Widespread implementation of a low-cost telehealth service in the delivery of antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis. The Lancet, 398(10294), 41-52.
Pflugeisen, B. M., McCarren, C., Poore, S., Carlile, M., & Schroeder, R. (2016). Virtual visits: managing prenatal care with modern technology. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 41(1), 24-30.
Rasa, T., & Laherto, A. (2022). Young people’s technological images of the future: implications for science and technology education. European Journal of Futures Research, 10(1), 4.
Reisinger‐Kindle, K., Qasba, N., Cayton, C., Niakan, S., Knee, A., & Goff, S. L. (2021). Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America. Health Science Reports, 4(4), e455.
Rhoads, S. J., Serrano, C. I., Lynch, C. E., Ounpraseuth, S. T., Gauss, C. H., Payakachat, N., ... & Eswaran, H. (2017). Exploring implementation of m-health monitoring in postpartum women with hypertension. Telemedicine and e-Health, 23(10), 833-841.
Satria, M.H., Yunus, J.B. and Supriyanto, E. (2014) “Emergency prenatal telemonitoring system in Wireless Mesh Network,” TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 12(1), p. 123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v12i1.1973.
Schneider, P. J. (2013). Evaluating the impact of telepharmacy. American journal of health-system pharmacy, 70(23), 2130-2135.
Tedeschi, C. (2021). Ethical, legal, and social challenges in the development and implementation of disaster telemedicine. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 15(5), 649-656.
Thimbleby, H. (2013). Technology and the future of healthcare. Journal of public health research, 2(3), jphr-2013