Analysis of employee attitudes and perceptions towards cancer survivors: A literature review
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Cancer survivors face significant challenges in reintegrating into the workforce, often impacted by biased attitudes and perceptions from colleagues and employers. These biases can hinder their productivity and professional satisfaction, emphasizing the need for more inclusive and supportive workplace environments. This descriptive literature review aims to summarize and synthesize existing research on employee attitudes and perceptions among cancer survivors. Utilizing a a inclusion and exclision criteria, the study identifies, screens, and includes relevant papers from various databases, focusing on articles published between 2010 and 2024. The findings the study found the complex relationship between employment, public perceptions, and support systems for cancer survivors re-entering the workforce. A collaborative approach involving healthcare providers, employers, and the public is crucial for optimizing the return-to-work experience.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Brennan, J., & Moynihan, C. (2004). Cancer in context: A practical guide to supportive care. Oxford Medical Publications.
Clur, L. S. (2015). Returning to Work: Exploring the Lived Experience of the Cancer Survivor. University of South Africa.
Coffin, T. B., & Kenner, B. J. (2022). Challenges in Recruitment and Retention: Leveraging Health-Related Antecedents and Information Carrier Factors to Improve Patient Participation in Pancreatic Cancer Research—A Review Article. Pancreas, 51(9), 1074–1082.
De Moor, J. S., Alfano, C. M., Kent, E. E., Norton, W. E., Coughlan, D., Roberts, M. C., Grimes, M., & Bradley, C. J. (2018). Recommendations for research and practice to improve work outcomes among cancer survivors. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 110(10), 1041–1047.
Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(5), 654–663.
Follmer, K. B., Sabat, I. E., & Siuta, R. L. (2020). Disclosure of stigmatized identities at work: An interdisciplinary review and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(2), 169–184.
Galluzzo, J. A. (2022). Trans and Genderqueer Military Service Member-Veterans: An Acculturation Phenomenology of Civilian Reintegration. University of Denver.
Garrick, A., Johnson, W. D., & Arendt, S. W. (2024). Breaking barriers: Strategies for fostering inclusivity in the workplace. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 14(2), 115–121.
Hair, K., Bahor, Z., Macleod, M., Liao, J., & Sena, E. S. (2023). The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews. BMC Biology, 21(1), 189.
Johnson, S. S. (2024). The Urgent Need to Advance Health Equity: Past and Present. American Journal of Health Promotion, 38(3), 427–447.
Kunz, K. R., Turcotte, K., Pawer, S., Zheng, A., Purewal, A., Wellar, A., Karmali, S., Garis, L., Thomas, L. S., & Pike, I. (2023). Cancer in female firefighters: The clinicobiological, psychological, and social perspectives. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1126066.
Lazarus, R. S. (2020). Psychological stress in the workplace. In Occupational stress (pp. 3–14). CRC Press.
Mehnert, A., de Boer, A., & Feuerstein, M. (2013). Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer, 119, 2151–2159.
Nishii, L. H., & Wright, P. M. (2007). Variability within organizations: Implications for strategic human resource management.
Pickens, J. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions. Organizational Behavior in Health Care, 4(7), 43–76.
Spelten, E. R., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M. (2002). Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho‐Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer, 11(2), 124–131.
Sun, Y., Shigaki, C. L., & Armer, J. M. (2017). Return to work among breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25, 709–718.
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209–249.
Taplin, S. H., Anhang Price, R., Edwards, H. M., Foster, M. K., Breslau, E. S., Chollette, V., Prabhu Das, I., Clauser, S. B., Fennell, M. L., & Zapka, J. (2012). Introduction: understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 2012(44), 2–10.
Vineis, P., & Wild, C. P. (2014). Global cancer patterns: causes and prevention. The Lancet, 383(9916), 549–557.
Waffenschmidt, S., Knelangen, M., Sieben, W., Bühn, S., & Pieper, D. (2019). Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 1–9.
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211.
Wells, M., Williams, B., Firnigl, D., Lang, H., Coyle, J., Kroll, T., & MacGillivray, S. (2013). Supporting ‘work‐related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’after cancer? A systematic review and meta‐synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psycho‐oncology, 22(6), 1208–1219.
Xiang, E., Guzman, P., Mims, M., & Badr, H. (2022). Balancing work and cancer care: challenges faced by employed informal caregivers. Cancers, 14(17), 4146.