Dispensation for underage marriage: a legal analysis and its implications for adolescent reproductive health in indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/midwifery.v14i2.2364Keywords:
Adolescent reproductive health, Normative juridical, Marriage dispensation, PERMA No. 5/2019, Underage marriageAbstract
Child marriage, facilitated through judicial marriage dispensation mechanisms, constitutes a persistent public health and human rights crisis in Indonesia. Despite the enactment of Law No. 16 of 2019, which raised the minimum marriage age for women from 16 to 19 years, dispensation applications surged by approximately 171% between 2018 and 2020—from 23,700 to 64,211 cases—revealing a profound policy paradox. This study employs a normative juridical method with statute, conceptual, and case approaches to systematically analyze the adequacy of Indonesia's legal framework governing marriage dispensation in protecting adolescent reproductive health. The analysis reveals three compounding structural deficiencies: (1) normative inadequacy of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 5 of 2019, which mandates health considerations without prescribing enforceable standards; (2) pervasive legal pluralism that subordinates child protection norms to customary and religious considerations; and (3) the absence of an interdisciplinary adjudicative framework integrating reproductive health evidence into judicial decision-making. Findings from five Religious Court jurisdictions demonstrate that premarital pregnancy dominates as the grant rationale (averaging 68.2% of cases), while substantive health consideration occurs in fewer than 7% of decisions. Provinces with the highest dispensation rates—including South Kalimantan and West Sulawesi—simultaneously record maternal mortality ratios and adolescent anemia prevalence significantly above national averages, indicating a structurally mediated relationship between legal permissiveness and reproductive health burden. This study proposes a four-dimensional health-responsive legal reform framework encompassing: legislative amendment of Article 7(2), mandatory health screening protocols in PERMA revision, judicial capacity building, and harmonization with CRC and CEDAW obligations.
Downloads
References
Akbari, R. (2025). Marriage Dispensation and the Best Interests of the Child: A Judicial Analysis of Urgent Reasons in the Purwodadi Religious Court. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(3), 2812–2826. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i3.1354
Andini, E., & Harahap, M. Y. (2024). Judge’s Reasoning Against the Dispensation of Marriage of Minors Due to Pregnancy After the Enactment of Law No. 16 of 2019 (Study of the Pandan Religious Court). Journal Equity of Law and Governance, 5(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.22225/elg.5.2.10462.105-111
Apriliansyah, M. A., Gulo, A. N. M., & Subhan, B. (2026). Judicial Reasoning in Marriage Dispensation at The Takengon Syar’iyah Court: A Critical Analysis of Legal Pluralism and The Paradox of Child Protection. Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 16(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.22373/pb7fw142
Asmuni, A., & Adikara, R. N. A. R. N. (2024). Application of Very Urgent Criteria in The Marriage Dispensation Norms for the Protection of Children: Analysis of Jasser Auda’s Theory. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 22(1), 25–56. https://e-journal.uingusdur.ac.id/jhi/article/view/jhi_v22i1_2
Chaturathorn, S., Anggaretno, S. W. N., Badrul, H., Woods, J., & Oliveira, A. (2025). The Justice Dilemma in Minor Marriages: Dispensation vs. Prevention. Unnes Law Journal, 11(2), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v11i2.3920
Damayanti, A. D., & Ramadhani, D. A. (2025). Implementing the SDGS: Implications for Regulating Marriage Age in Indonesia. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 10(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v10i1.1091
Djunastuti, E., Alhadiansyah, A., Susila, S., Marnita, M., & Tahir, M. (2023). Application For Marriage Dispensation For Underage Pregnant Women Post The Application Of Law Number 16 Of 2019 Concerning Amendment To Law Number 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage. JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES), 6(3), 699–706. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v7i3.7876
Efendie, E., Sugiarto, A., & Putra, M. D. (2024). The Convergence Between Textual Law And Progressive Law In Addressing Contemporary Legal Challenges. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 10(2), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6780
Hasmita, D., Ropii, I., & Putra, M. D. (2026). Legal Analysis of Female Circumcision in The Context of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 8(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.8550
Hulu, I. L., Harahap, S. K., & Ismayani, I. (2025). Legal protection for minors age of applicant marriage dispensation reviewed from Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning changes to the Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage. Requisitoire Law Enforcement, 17(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.59651/relae.v17i1.273
Idrus, N. I. (2022). Problematizing the Minimum Age of Marriage: The State and Local Perspective on Marriage Dispensation in South Sulawesi. Humaniora, 34(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.73661
Insani, N., Beddu, S., Rahman, R., Arpin, A., & Samuri, M. A. A. (2024). Judicial Considerations in Child Marriage Dispensations: An Empirical Study of the Gorontalo Religious Court. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 22(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v22i1.2066
Khafid, M., Shabah, M. A. A., & Ab Hamid, N. A. (2025). Dispensing with Age? Marriage Dispensation, Household Resilience, and the Tensions Between Islamic and State Law. Sakina: Journal of Family Studies, 9(3), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.18860/jfs.v9i3.16724
Maharani, M., Rahardiansyah, R., & Luthviatin, N. (2024). Factors, impacts, and efforts in preventing early marriage culture on women’s reproductive health: Literature review. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3148, Number 1, p. 30021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0241796
Mashdurohatun, A., Mutalip, A., Kusriyah, S., & Rofiq, A. (2023). Reconstruction of Application for Marriage Dispensation Regulation in Religious Court Based on Islamic Justice. JL Pol’y & Globalization, 132, 67. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/jawpglob132§ion=9
Moelyono, A., Patria, R. Y., & Dwiarti, F. S. (2022). Marriage dispensation policy in children protection: Evaluation of article 7 paragraph (2) of law number 16 of 2019 concerning amendments to law number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage. Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial, 10(01), 75–90. https://jurnal.staialhidayahbogor.ac.id/index.php/am/article/view/2255
Mohsi, M., Romli, M., Zakaria, S., & Fudholi, M. (2025). Harmonizing Legal Pluralism in Marriage Laws: Policy Challenges on Child Marriage in Madura. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 10(2), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v10i2.11048
Monika, R., & Djaja, B. (2023). Granting Dispensation to Children Who Marry Underage After the Enactment of Law Number 16 of 2019 (Decision Number 157/Pst. P/2020/Pa. Sbr). Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 2(9), 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i9.110
Mursyid, S., & Yusuf, N. (2022). Changes in Marriage Age Limits and Marriage Dispensations: A Study of Causes and Impacts on the Religious Courts in North Sulawesi. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 975–996. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12439
Nakmofa, J. A., Adnyani, N. K. S., & Sanjaya, D. B. (2024). The Impact Of Child Marriage Dispensation On The Increasing Divorce Rate In Buleleng Regency (Case Study At Singaraja District Court). International Journal of Law, Tourism, and Culture, 2(3), 157–166. https://semnas-fmipa.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJLTC/article/view/4986
Nawi, S., & Zainuddin, Z. (2023). Legal Implications Of Marriage Dispensation Post Amendment To Act Number 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage. Iblam Law Review, 3(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v3i3.167
Nuraeni, F., & Songgirin, A. (2024). Legal Analysis of Marriage Dispensation Underage in Jagabita Village, Bogor, Using the Compilation of Islamic Law Approach. Journal of Islamic Law and Legal Studies, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.70063/sharialex.v1i1.3
Palasenda, N. F. (2025). The Problem of Marriage Dispensation Between Theory and Practice. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 3(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.14
Partama, T. A., & Putra, M. D. (2025). Normative Analysis Of Professional Ethics And Legal Accountability Of Health Workers In The Implementation Of Informed Consent. In International Seminar (Vol. 7, pp. 102–112). https://doi.org/10.36563/49sfwm12
Purwanti, A., & Natalis, A. (2025). Law as Text, Culture as Context: The Semiotics of Marriage Dispensation and Judicial Considerations in Indonesia. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10370-0
Putra, M. D. (2025a). Pluralisme Hukum Di Indonesia. Unidhapress.
Putra, M. D. (2025b). Reconstruction Of Legal Norms As A Regional Head Candidate For Persons With Disabilities With Justice. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 11(1), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v11i1.8220
Rizal, S. S., & Khoir, N. (2025). The Marriage Dispensation Paradox: The Increase in Early Marriages Following the Revision of the Marriage Law in Probolinggo. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities, 4(2), 394–404. https://journal.staitaruna.ac.id/index.php/ijith/article/view/639
Rohmawati, R. (2025). Seeking Justice In Islamic Legal Pluralism: The Dispute of Child Best Interests in Marriage Dispensation in Indonesia. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 19, 147–178. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2024.19.02.147-178
Sekarrini, L., Prasetyo, S., & Kusumayati, A. (2025). Child marriage dispensation from a reproductive health perspective: why do judges grant or reject applications? International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 37(6), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2025-0108
Seputra, H. R., & Putra, M. D. (2026). Reconstruction of Telemedicine Regulations In The Indonesian Health Legal System Based on A Legal Pluralism Approach. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(3), 1968–1978. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3146
Sriono, S., Mashdurohatun, A., Kusriyah, S., & Rofiq, A. (2023). Reconstruction of Marriage Dispensation Regulations in the Perspective of Human Rights Based on the Value of Justice. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 6(04), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2023.v06i04.005
Sudirman, Umrah, S., & Surahman. (2023). Legal dysfunction in granting dispensation to underage marriages in indonesia. J. Int’l L. Islamic L., 19, 137. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/jispil19§ion=24
Suhardi, M. (2025). Legal Pluralism and Cultural Legitimacy: Reframing Sasak Customary Law to Prevent Child Marriage in Lombok. Society, 13(1), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.818
Syafutry, S. T., Mufidi, F., & Nurhasanah, N. (2024). Marriage Dispensation of Minors by Religious Courts in Relation to Women’s Reproductive Health Rights. Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, 3(9), 2076–2090. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v3i9.437
Umrah, S. (2023). Legal Dysfunction in Granting Dispensation to Underage Marriages In Indonesia. Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law & Practice, 19(2). https://www.electronicpublications.org/stuff/969
Widiyanto, A., Zumrotun, S., & Saputra, H. (2024). The Prevention of Underage Marriage in Indonesia: State, Religious Authority and Human Rights. Justicia Islamica, 21(2), 401–422. http://jurnal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/justicia/article/view/9771
Yumna, H. (2025). The Impact of Marriage Dispensation Policy Interventions on Underage Marriage Trends Among Banyuwangi Teenagers. Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, 8(2), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v8i2.356
Zachary, R. I. A., & Nurhayani, N. (2025). Legal Analysis of Marriage Dispensation Requests for Minors in Cases of Premarital Pregnancy (Case Study: Decision No. 82/PDT. P/2024/PA. PROB). Journal of Law and Economics, 4(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.56347/jle.v4i2.329
